Welcome back! After finishing the first round of live-tweeting as I explained in my last blog post, it is now time to deep-dive into week 6-11 of BCM325 Futures Cultures screenings! After my self-reflection of my tweets from weeks 1-5 and feedback from my tutor, Chris, I decided to undergo research before the screenings to ensure what I was tweeting during the screening was relevant and not just ticking the box whilst engaging with the subject content.
This round of screenings were a lot more thought-provoking in terms of the implications of technology on society which I reflected in my tweets, asking questions of my peers and coming to sense of the themes present in the screenings in today’s world.
Week 6
Screening: Robot & Frank (2012)
Topic: Artificial Intelligence (A.I.)
Tweets & Interactions –
![](https://chelswood.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/untitled-4.png?w=595)
![](https://chelswood.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/untitled-5.png?w=590)
![](https://chelswood.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/untitled-6.png?w=576)
In week 6 (one of my favourite screenings), I began to implement the subject materials more after the feedback from round one of live-tweeting. For example asking how my peers perceived themselves in relation to a quote I had sourced in terms of pessimists, pragmatists, doubters and optimists‘ attitudes towards AI (Moore, 2020). I also drew parallels between other screenings such as Ghost in the Shell which later I researched was actually in The Blade Runner through a similar projection that the ‘bots’ knew that they weren’t alive but used a similar quote as “I think therefore I am” to describe their existence, questioning what it means to be human.
Week 8
Screening: Arrival (2016)
Topic: Futurists
Tweets & Interactions –
![](https://chelswood.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/untitled.png?w=587)
![](https://chelswood.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/untitled-3.png?w=582)
In week 8 I tweeted about and observed that there was an ongoing theme of fear of the unknown of the possible futures that may arise from ‘intruders’ on earth and how that may impact us as a society. According to Wendell Bell, futurists have a common goal which is to seek to know what can or could be (the possible), what is likely to be (the probable) and what ought to be (the preferable) which is what my peers and my owns tweets were seeking to do. The commentary with my peers on this topic fascinated me, especially with conversations around linguistic barriers and how power influences this fear of the unknown. I could have improved my tweets this week by sharing more of the subject materials such as the work of Wendell Bell (1997) stating “In the broadest sense, futurists hope to inform people’s expectations of the future and to help make their efforts shape the future…” which can be seen in the text as the Dr adopts futurist thinking by attempting to inform expectations of the intruder’s to help make their combined efforts in understanding their language and purpose shape the future of the intruders’ impact.
Week 9:
Screening: Alita: Battle Angel (2019)
Topic: Cyborgs
Tweets & Interactions –
![](https://chelswood.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/untitled-2.png?w=597)
In Week 9, I found the topic of cyborgs most interesting especially because it sounds like an absurd concept but considering our use of technology to advance human function, not surprising when you deep-dive. Our relationship with technology and our bodies is argued by McLuhan to be “…extensions of our physical and nervous systems to increase power and speed” and therefore, we are all cyborgs to some degree due to the nature of technology enhancing the human function. This was the focus of my tweets this week, sharing the history of cyborg technology in our every day lives from past, present and future as you can’t have on without the other and how this has evolved over time. “History cannot be imagined without a concept of the past having a future“. I also outlined concerns around data, privacy and security concerns are prevalent in technology that makes us cyborgs today and the advances in the future which was relevant to the subject as a whole.
Week 10:
Screening: Ready Player One (2018)
Topic: Cyberspace
Tweets & Interactions –
This week I retweeted Jess’ tweet as I felt it was relevant that users feel more ‘at home’ in VR simulations than the ‘real’ world even though cyberspace very much exists in the real as it may not have actuality but still can be thought of as real (Deleuze, via Moore). It also links to the projection of persona in the online space and how people can express and project and online ‘self’ without fear of judgement. I also shared tweets around the themes (nostalgia, future, escapism, online privacy) and popular culture references made throughout the text (Back to the Future, Blade Runner and 2001: A Space Odyessy). I also tweeted about the parallel made between the text and The Matrix’s ‘blue-pill of global addiction projecting a dystopian view of cyberspace which has been made throughout history regarding new technologies. I also could have improved this weeks tweets by stating this research in my tweets.
Week 11:
Screening: Don’t Look Up (2021)
Topic: The Futures of Content – Paradigm Shift
Tweets & Interactions:
![](https://chelswood.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/untitled-7.png?w=590)
During the screening of Don’t Look Up, I mainly tweeted about the role of social media and it’s influence within society, especially on social, environmental and political issues we have and will face in the future. I believe that my tweets in this screening were more narrowed to the role of social media which I could have widened my scope to focus more on the subject materials for the week however, I do believe my tweets were observational of the text. I also could have improved this week by including references and subject materials that related to the paradigm shift of the comet destroying Earth and ending civilisation present in the film.
Representation of the future and its reality (podcast)