Reflecting upon my narrative conversation presentation and process, it is clear to me that my values informed my decision-making and the way I conducted myself and work when telling a story about a story.
To begin with, when deciding what questions to ask my interviewee, Sarah, my knowledge of her professional and personal background assisted in deciding which direction to take the interview as I already had the foundations to build upon to meet the requirements of the assessment. I asked Sarah to walk me through the development of her professional life from start to finish which led me into my next questions about her working values and the support around her. I found that each question led into the next seamlessly as I had prepared them in such a way.
I made and recorded my presentation on Canva, where I recorded my voice over slides and included snippets of the recorded phone interview I conducted with Sarah to show her exact words on certain topics. The themes that arose from the interview that were clearly related to Sarah’s personal values were loving your job, caring for people, that it’s never too late to learn a new skill or be part of a new industry, and being comfortable with change.
My expectations when beginning the interview process were that I would be able to conduct the interview quite comfortably. When my questions or the answers to those questions didn’t quite go to plan, pivoting to stay on topic was sometimes difficult. As Sarah didn’t know the background of the subject, this meant that it was difficult to get the answers that I wanted or to get her to elaborate in the way I needed. I often had to change my questions or prod her further to gain a deeper insight into her professional life.
Structuring the interview was made easier as I structured my questions around the recommended slide layout given by lecturer, Kate Bowles of BCM313 ‘The Future of Work’. The structure I undertook was asking about Sarah’s timeline of work, the turning point in her career, her hopes for the future and managing change. I then took my narrative story to connecting her journey to her club of life and values and finished with connecting these to theory discovered throughout the subject.
During the process, I felt comfortable as I already knew Sarah which assisted in connecting to her and being able to question her further or ask for clarification. I believe if I didn’t interview someone I already knew, it would have been more difficult to push for certain answers. I also believe that this previous connection with Sarah made her feel more comfortable and open as the interview was casual and non-intimidating.
I decided to record my presentation rather than present it live to ensure I could deliver my ideas in a more articulate way than I could presenting it live. Recording the presentation also allowed for a more seamless process on the day. Although it was more work upfront doing it this way as I had to record before the class, it relieved some pressure on the day as the work was already completed and all I had to do was answer questions at the end which also eased the anxiety around public speaking.
Although pre-recorded, the presentation was still a little uncomfortable as I was unsure if my ideas would translate to others’ in the class although we were learning about the same concepts and that I had fallen short compared to the others. I liked that we were able to choose which week we presented to the class as it eased so much pressure and allowed us to work around our other commitments and assignments. I liked the aspect of asking questions at the end of the presentations as it gave me room to expand on my thoughts as well as those who were delegated questions to think deeper and listen more actively to the presentations.
Through the principles of Michael White, such as externalising conversation and re-membering, the interview gave a greater insight into how values, both past and present form our identities through our experiences with other people, not only our interactions with them but how we see them and visualise our own identities through them.
Re-membering practices are based on the poststructuralist understanding that our identities are forged through our relationships with other people.
Maggie Carey & Shona Russell, Re-membering: commonly asked questions
Identifying my values through Sarah’s story was made clear through externalising conversation and outsider witnessing. By writing key phrases that intrigued or sparked my interest meant that these were elements in which I resonated with in some way. Phrases such as “caring for people”, “making a difference” and “conversing with people” were the main phrases I felt I resonated with most in my life, both personal and professional.
Through re-membering, Sarah was able to identify how her values were formed through the support of others within her club of life by reminiscing and reflecting on how these values have shaped her personal life and been further developed in her professional life. As Barbara Myerhoff (2007) states,
We are saying that our affairs matter, that we have not only a past, but because of that we have a future.
Upon reflection on the narrative process, the person I chose to interview had similar people values to myself. I find this interesting because I look up to these qualities that Sarah possesses. However, through the narrative interview process and outsider witnessing, I was able to identify that I possess similar values of caring and connecting to people which I have found a rewarding process overall.
References:
- Bowles, K., (2022). BCM313 ‘The Future of Work’
- Carey, M., & Russell, S., (2002). ‘Re-membering: commonly asked questions‘
- Myerhoff, B., (2007). Stories as Equipment for Living
- White, M., (2007). ‘Maps of Narrative Practice’